|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Severi Salminen wrote:
> Christoph Hormann wrote:
>
>> These seem all heavily post processed (in most cases even composites
>> from several photographs). None on them looks like a realistic photo
>> to me.
>
> That is because of what you expect.
No, that's because they are physically impossible. No photographic
technique can generate a photo where a brightness difference of the
scene in reality is inverted on the photo (i.e. a part brighter than a
second one in reality is darker than the second one on the photo).
>> Remember: i am not saying you can't tweak a photo to look similar to
>> Jaime's render. I am just saying that the lighting in the scene is
>> not completely realistic and a photo of such a scenery that is not
>> heavily altered would look quite a bit different.
>
>
> How about the third photo on this page:
>
> http://www.smsu.edu/design/projects/Library2.htm
>
> It at least resembles Jaime's photo distantly.
Not at all, the lighting situation is completely different - one whole
wall of the room is windows - even without the covering of the windows
Jaime's room would only have less than 1/3 of one wall as windows.
Christoph
--
POV-Ray tutorials, include files, Sim-POV,
HCR-Edit and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 06 Jul. 2004 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |